Our evidence
We'd rather be honest than impressive.
Research about phones and relationships gets exaggerated a lot. Here's how we try not to add to that.
Our rules
- Every claim links to its source. We link the original paper or report wherever we can. When we link a university or press summary instead, we say so.
- We say how strong it is. Each article carries a label (below).
- Links are not causes. Most research on phones and couples is surveys. We write "linked with", not "causes", unless an experiment shows more.
- We show what didn't hold up. When a famous finding fails to replicate, we say so and cite both.
- We credit ideas to where they started. For example, the "lantern and spotlight" idea comes from psychologist Alison Gopnik.
- No scare statistics, no medical claims. We won't tell you your phone is damaging your health or your marriage.
- No sponsors, no affiliate links, and no data collected from you on this site.
- We review articles twice a year, and each one shows when it was last checked.
Evidence labels
- Well established
- Large reviews of many studies, or big long-term studies. Unlikely to be overturned.
- Promising
- Several studies point the same way, but they are smaller, or mostly surveys that show a link rather than a cause.
- Mixed
- Good studies disagree. We show both sides.
- Early or debated
- A single study, a finding that did not replicate, or a theory that experts actively dispute.
- An idea, not a finding
- A useful way of thinking, from a researcher or author, rather than a measured result.
Spotted an error?
Please tell us at hello@proxima-connect.com. We'd much rather fix it than defend it.